CONCENTRATION CAMPS IN US: ARE THEY REAL?
It is reported that the HR 645 reports the below text:
By Mark Anderson
A bill introduced on
Jan. 22 of
this year “to direct the Secretary of Homeland Security
to establish national emergency centers
on military installations,” as the text of HR 645 actually
states as its
central purpose, could conceivably be geared toward creating what many
Americans
have feared in recent years—detention centers, or
concentration camps, on
American soil.
full article: http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/hilder_concamps_7239.html
If you go to FEMA's website the below speech is presented at the reasons for these concentration camps.....
excerpt of the speech from:
Craig Fugate
Administrator
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Department of Homeland Security
"While FEMA is certainly prepared to provide a large number of temporary housing resources following
a disaster, the sheer size, scope, nature and duration of the sheltering needs after a catastrophic
event require us to look at alternatives, and will require the coordinated involvement of federal
agencies, state, local and tribal governments, the private sector, and voluntary and faith-based
groups. As I noted in recent testimony before another House committee, disaster housing, particularly
following a catastrophic event, is not a mission that FEMA can or will ever be able to effectively
handle alone. However, it is a mission to which FEMA is committed to providing national leadership.
The emergency management community has developed several very real, potential catastrophic scenarios,
and the number of potential disaster survivors that may need sheltering and housing is enormous.
For example, planning experts anticipate that following a New Madrid Seismic Zone no-notice earthquake,
a projected 2.6 million people will require shelter. It is also estimated that following a Category 5
Hurricane in the most populous areas of Florida, as many as 3.6 million households will seek either
short- or long-term shelter. After a catastrophic hurricane affecting Honolulu and the island of Oahu,
it is projected that 650,000 residents would be in need of shelter.
These numbers can increase significantly due to the unknowns - significant aftershocks, ensuing fires,
safety and security concerns, additional significant weather conditions that could affect population
movements, and temporary sheltering requirements dependent on seasonal weather conditions. The bottom
line is that neither the federal government nor the manufactured housing industry has the capacity to
address all the anticipated housing needs in a timely manner in these types of situations.
Because of this, we will need to rely on other, more innovative housing options.
Although our first priority is always to shelter and house survivors in or near their communities,
that will simply not be possible in a truly catastrophic event or an event involving contamination.
While we continue to aggressively explore options to quickly provide or restore housing in affected
areas, the capability will simply never exist to locally shelter and temporarily house half a million
or more survivors. Instead, we all need to recognize the need for a timely, organized, and
disciplined relocation of survivors to venues where such shelter and follow-on temporary housing
exists. The reality is that, if a region is sufficiently devastated by a catastrophic disaster,
it may be many months or years before recovery has progressed to the point many disaster survivors
will be able to return to their homes and communities.
Accordingly, we must temporarily place survivors in environments conducive to personal stabilization
and recovery where they are, as their communities are rebuilt. Other options that must be considered
include rehabilitating rental units that can be repaired quickly, similar to the efforts undertaken by
FEMA in Iowa and Texas under a recent pilot program authorized by the Post Katrina Emergency
Management Reform Act’s Rental Repair Pilot Program. This legislation also gave FEMA additional
authorities to undertake semi-permanent and permanent construction work to make repairs.
We must also look at ways to speed up the infusion of eligible public assistance funding to
communities, which can be financially devastated and thus unable to commence critical infrastructure
repair projects without up-front funding. Spurring timely recovery at the community level will
send a powerful message of hope to community disaster survivors, as well as create jobs that may
prove crucial in keeping many residents in those communities. I firmly believe that we can make
our public assistance program less process-oriented and more outcome-driven, and we are working
toward exactly that. We are also working with our federal partners to improve the delivery of
additional federal long-term recovery assistance."
full speech at this link: http://www.fema.gov/txt/about/testimony/072709_fugate.txt
In other words the reason they have these camps is in order to house a large number of people after a
horrific event......
Believe or not to believe. Not sure.







Good job with this. I like it when people do their own research about things than just assume they are true because they read them somewhere. You made me think twice about those concentration camps because all you see on youtube is about those.
Reply to this